2005-02-02

Race

Asia
Africa
Genetics
Miscellaneous





















Asia


2007-09-02-NYT-Singapore
Modern Singapore’s Creator Is Alert to Perils
By SETH MYDANS and WAYNE ARNOLD
New York Times, 2007-09-02

[Most of the article; emphasis is added.]

SINGAPORE, Sept. 1 —
Lee Kuan Yew,
who turned a malarial island [Singapore]
into a modern financial center with a first-world skyline,
is peering ahead again into this city-state’s future....

For all his success, Mr. Lee, 83,
remains on the alert for perils that may exist only on the distant horizon:
the rising role of China in the region as the United States looks the other way,
the buffeting of the world economy, even
climate change.

A British-educated lawyer who led Singapore for 31 years,
Mr. Lee is one of Asia’s remarkable personalities,
a world figure whose guest book is filled with
the names of international political and financial leaders.

His creation, modern Singapore, is an economic powerhouse with
one of the world’s highest per capita incomes
and high-quality schools, health care and public services
that have made it a magnet for global labor.
Foreigners make up roughly a fifth of its 4.5 million residents.

In his office in
the former headquarters of the island’s British colonial rulers ...

“To understand Singapore,” he said,
“you’ve got to start off with an improbable story:
It should not exist.”

It is a nation
with almost no natural resources,
without a common culture
a fractured mix of Chinese, Malays and Indians,
relying on wits to stay afloat and prosper.

“We have survived so far, 42 years,” he said. “Will we survive for another 42?
It depends upon world conditions. It doesn’t depend on us alone.”

This sense of vulnerability is Mr. Lee’s answer to all his critics,
to those who say Singapore is too tightly controlled, that it
leashes the press,
suppresses free speech,
curtails democracy,
tramples on dissidents and
stunts entrepreneurship and creativity in its citizens.

“The answer lies in our genesis,” he said.
“To survive, we have to do these things.
And although what you see today — the superstructure of a modern city —
the base is a very narrow one and could easily disintegrate.”

One of his concerns now, Mr. Lee said, is that
the United States has become so preoccupied with the Middle East
that it is failing to look ahead and plan in this part of the world.


“I think it’s a real drag slowing down adjusting to the new situation,”
he said, describing what he called
a lapse that worries Southeast Asian countries that count on Washington
to balance the rising economic and diplomatic power of China.

“Without this draining of energy, attention and resources for
Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine,
there would have been deep thinking about the long-term trends —
working out possible options that the U.S. could exercise
to change the direction of long-term trends more in its favor,”
Mr. Lee said.

[This is what some might call
the opportunity cost of Washington’s Middle East obsession.]


As the United States focuses on the Middle East, Mr. Lee said,
the Chinese are busy refining their policies and
building the foundations of more cooperative long-term relationships in Asia.
“They are making strategic decisions on their relations with the region,”
he said.

And this is where tiny Singapore sees itself as a model for China,
the world’s most-populous country.
“They’ve got to be like us,” Mr. Lee said,
“with a very keen sense of what is possible, and what is not.”

Every year, he said, Chinese ministers meet twice with Singaporean ministers
to learn from their experience.
Fifty mayors of Chinese cities visit every three months
for courses in city management.

Singapore’s secret, Mr. Lee said, is that it is “ideology free.”
It possesses an unsentimental pragmatism
that infuses the workings of the country as if it were in itself an ideology,
he said.
When considering an approach to an issue, he says, the question is:
“Does it work? Let’s try it, and if it does work, fine, let’s continue it.
If it doesn’t work, toss it out, try another one.”

[Nonsense.
Singapore’s real “secret” is the high quality of its people,
their intelligence and work ethic.]


The yardstick, he said, is:
“Is this necessary for survival and progress? If it is, let’s do it.”

...

“I think we have to go in whatever direction world conditions dictate
if we are to survive and to be part of this modern world,” he said.
“If we are not connected to this modern world, we are dead.
We’ll go back to the fishing village we once were.”

...

As for people’s adherence to
the “Asian values” — hierarchy, respect and order —
that Singapore is founded on, he said:
“It’s already diluted,
and we can see it in the difference between the generations.
It’s inevitable.”

In his own family, generational values are changing.
From father to children to grandchildren, he said,
command of the Chinese language has weakened,
along with the culture it embodies.

“They had a basic set of traditional Confucian values,”
he said of his children, two sons and a daughter. “Not my grandchildren.”

...

This well-educated younger generation
reflects the social dichotomy of Singapore,
Mr. Lee said, in which
the top 20 percent of the population is as cosmopolitan as any,
surfing the Internet and traveling the world without constraint.
“This is not a closed society,” he insisted.

But at the same time, he said,
the government must protect the less affluent, less educated people
from information that might upset or confuse them.
These are people “who are not finding it so comfortable
to suddenly find the world changed, their world, their sense of place,
their sense of position in society.”

They are the ones who he said had to be pulled into the future
as he seeks to make Singapore “a first-world oasis in a third-world region.”

“We built up the infrastructure,” he said.
“The difficult part was getting the people to change their habits
so that they behaved more like first-world citizens,
not like third-world citizens spitting and littering all over the place.”

So Singapore embarked on what Mr. Lee called
“campaigns to do this, campaigns to do that.”

Do not chew gum.
Do not throw garbage from rooftops.
Speak good English.
Smile.
Perform spontaneous acts of kindness.

Paradoxically, he said,
if Singapore had not been so poor
it might never have transformed itself and prospered as it has.

His warnings about vulnerability and collapse
are a constant theme
to persuade his people to accept limits on their freedoms.

“Supposing we had oil and gas,
do you think I could get the people to do this?” Mr. Lee said.
“No. If I had oil and gas,
I’d have a different people, with different motivations and expectations.

“It’s because we don’t have oil and gas and they know that we don’t have,
and they know that
this progress comes from their efforts,”
he said.
“So please do it and do it well.”
















Africa


2008-05-17-WP-Zimbabwe
Gruesome Killings by Mugabe Supporters Detailed
Villagers Suffered Zimbabwe's Worst Violence in 20 Years;
New Vote Set for June 27

by Washington Post Foreign Service
Washington Post, 2008-05-17 (page A13)

[The conclusion.]

One of the most ruthless attacks was on Funyisai Dofo, 28, who was returning from working in the fields outside Chaona, he said, when four men demanded to know why he had not attended the ruling party meeting. When Dofo explained that he had been working, the men accused him of supporting the opposition and starting beating him with sticks.

“They wanted me to confess that I had voted for the MDC during the elections,” Dofo recalled. “All this time I was screaming for help. One of them had a pistol, so every time I try to scream for help he would threaten to shoot me. They were taking turns to beat me up. It was as if I was an animal.”

Then one of the men announced he was going “to fix Dofo once and for all.” The attacker stripped off Dofo’s clothes, sat him on a large rock, then crushed his testicles with a stomp from a booted foot. Dofo passed out.

He woke up in a cart. Somebody was wheeling him to the hospital.

A few minutes after Dofo recounted his story, he turned to his wife, Melody Dofo, who was at the hospital with their daughter, Rufaro, 2.

“Listen, Melody,” he said, “they have killed me for no reason, these ZANU-PF people. I am dying, but take care of our kid.”

Funyisai Dofo died an hour later.















Genetics

2007


2007-11-11-NYT-DNA
In DNA Era, New Worries About Prejudice
By AMY HARMON
New York Times, 2007-11-11













Miscellaneous

Labels:

Race, gender differences

An example:
Lupus is two to three times more prevalent among people of color,
including African Americans, Hispanics/Latinos, Asians, and Native Americans.”


Can you believe that there are people who assert that
“There is no such thing as race”,
“Race is only skin deep”, and
“Race is a cultural construct”?

What a bunch of disgusting liars and/or clowns!
Too bad many of them are actually teaching in universities (e.g.),
misleading generations of undergraduates.

Beware the lying PC (of multiple races and ethnicities).














2006


2009-06-06-WP-Ulen
The Color of Love Can Be Confusing

By Eisa Nefertari Ulen

Biologically speaking, there is no such thing as race.
Race does not exist.
Except, of course, that it does.
Politically, socially, economically, race is very real,
and the legacy of racism informs every aspect of American life,
sometimes unexpectedly, often intimately.

...


2006-06-07-NYT-racial-factor-in-breast-cancer
Racial Component Is Found in Lethal Breast Cancer
By DENISE GRADY
New York Times, 2006-06-07

[1]
Young black women with breast cancer are more prone than whites or older blacks to develop a type of tumor with genetic traits that make it especially deadly and hard to treat, a study has found.

[2]
Among premenopausal black women with breast cancer, 39 percent had the more dangerous kind, called a “basal like” subtype, compared with only 14 percent of older black women and 16 percent of nonblack women of any age. Researchers are not sure why.

[3]
The study, being published today in The Journal of the American Medical Association, is the first to measure how common the different genetic subtypes of breast tumors are in American women, and to sort the subtypes by race. The authors said more research was needed to test their conclusions.

[4]
The finding has no immediate effect on treatment, because there is no treatment that specifically concentrates on basal-like cancer. But scientists are trying to create drugs that will zero in on it.

[5]
The study helps explain something that was already known: although breast cancer is less common in blacks than whites, when black women do develop the disease, they are more likely to die from it, especially if they are under 50. Among those younger women, the breast cancer death rate in blacks is 11 per 100,000, compared with only 6.3 in whites.

[6]
The new data about tumor types is not the whole story, researchers say, because some of the disparity may also result from a lack of access to health care among blacks or differences in nutrition, personal habits or environmental exposures.

...








2009


2009-03-19-NYT-heart-failure-strikes-blacks
Heart Failure Strikes Blacks More Often and at Younger Ages, Study Finds
By RONI CARYN RABIN
New York Times, 2009-03-19

Black adults developed heart failure at a rate 20 times higher than did whites, even dying of it decades before the condition typically strikes whites, in a large multicenter study of the causes of heart disease, researchers reported.

Heart failure typically occurs in the elderly and is rare in young adults. Researchers did not expect to see much of it among the 5,115 young blacks and whites, evenly split along racial and sex lines, that they had been following to learn about causes of heart disease. But after 20 years, 27 participants in the study had developed heart failure, all but one of them black.

Most of the heart failure patients were in their 30s and 40s. Three black men and two black women with heart failure died during the study period.

The researchers estimated that heart failure strikes one in 100 blacks under age 50 in the United States.

...

2009-06-10-WP-Racial-Disparities-in-Illness
Racial Disparities in Illness Highlighted
Study Finds Alarmingly High Rates Among Black Women
By Darryl Fears
Washington Post, 2009-06-10

[This article appeared in the Metro section, page B-4, of the Post.
Immediately below it was a photo accompaning another article.
Although that article had nothing to do with the subject of this article,
nonetheless the photo captures, perhaps better than words,
just how severe the problem is in some cases.]


[1]
Black women in the District suffer from
obesity, diabetes, heart disease and generally poor health
in alarmingly high numbers,
and white women do not.

[2]
That is the finding of a study released early today
by the Kaiser Family Foundation.
The study said
there is a large disparity in the incidence of certain chronic diseases
between black and white women.

[3]
Kaiser’s study was based on data compiled by
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
and the federal Current Population Survey
from 2004 to 2006.
The study reflected health statistics in the states and the District.

[4]
In the District, the study also found wide gaps between black and white women
in the incidence of other illnesses such as cancer and HIV and AIDS.
According to the study,
black women’s poor health is tied to
low education, poverty, unemployment, stress, bad living conditions
and poor health care coverage.

[5]
Black women’s health in the District also compared unfavorably
with that of other minority women.
According to the study,
36 percent of black women were overweight or obese, compared with
about 10 percent of Hispanic and Asian women in the city.
More than 7 percent of black women suffered from diabetes,
compared with 2 percent of Hispanic women and 3 percent of Asian women.
Fewer than 1 percent of white women suffered from diabetes,
and 7 percent were overweight or obese.

[6]
“Black women in the District are really struggling,”
said Cara James,
a senior policy analyst at Kaiser and the study’s lead author.
“This is a chronic condition that we know is related to poverty
and the availability of nutritious food and the opportunity to exercise.”

[7]
Personal responsibility among black women is an issue,
but so is the government’s responsibility to
“make sure that people understand the importance of exercising and doing exercise
and also to make sure that neighborhoods are safe to walk,”
James said.

[8]
A quarter of black women in the District live below the poverty line,
defined as an income of $19,000 a year for a family of four
at the time of the study.
About 14 percent of black women in the city had no high school diploma,
one of the lowest percentages in the Washington area.

[9]
James acknowledged that
comparing black women’s health with white women’s health in the District
is somewhat unfair,
as the city’s white women
tend to be among the healthiest and wealthiest in the nation --
“the valedictorians of the class” when it comes to health, James said.

[10]
In Maryland and Virginia, disparities between black women and white women were narrower.
In Maryland,
37 percent of black women were overweight or obese,
compared with 21 percent of white women, according to the study.
In Virginia, the rate was 36 percent for black women
and 17 percent for white women.

[11]
The disparity between black and white women for diabetes
was also narrower in the neighboring states than in the District,
as was the cancer mortality rate.
In the District, the cancer mortality rate was 204 per 100,000 black women
and 137 per 100,000 white women.
In Maryland, the cancer mortality rate was 191 per 100,000 black women
and 166 per 100,000 white women.
In Virginia, the cancer mortality disparity was slightly greater than in Maryland.

[12]
In the District,
the incidence of new HIV/AIDS infections for black women -- 176 per 100,000 --
was far larger than for any other group of women.
The rate for Hispanic women was 48 per 100,000, according to the study.

[13]
A D.C. government study this year said
the city’s overall AIDS prevalence rate was 3 percent, the highest in the nation.
In Virginia, the rate is 31 per 100,000,
and in Maryland, the rate is 68 per 100,000.

[14]
The District’s health director, Pierre Vigilance,
said the city is working to address the disparities.

[15]
“We understand that health disparities cut across different lines --
race, socioeconomic status --
and it’s unfortunate that we’re in a district
where the burden of those problems are borne out more,” Vigilance said.
“We’ve been doing more to look at how to address access to more health care for women, and especially mothers.”

[16]
James said the District should be credited with those efforts.
“D.C. has done a good job with lowering disparities in health coverage,”
she said.
“But it’s not sufficient to eliminate disparities.”



2009-07-08-WP-Blacks-with-equal-care
Blacks With Equal Care Still More Likely to Die of Some Cancers
By Rob Stein
Washington Post, 2009-07-08

[1]
African Americans are less likely than whites to survive breast, prostate and ovarian cancer even when they receive equal treatment, according to a large study that offers provocative evidence that biological factors play a role in at least some racial disparities.

[2]
The first-of-its-kind study, involving nearly 20,000 cancer patients nationwide, found that the gap in survival between blacks and whites disappeared for lung, colon and several other cancers when they received identical care as part of federally funded clinical trials. But disparities persisted for prostate, breast and ovarian cancer, suggesting that other factors must be playing a role in the tendency of blacks to fare more poorly.

[3]
For decades, studies have shown that poor people and minorities are more likely to live shorter, sicker lives, and are less likely to survive a host of illnesses, including many cancers. Studies have indicated that the disparities were largely the result of poor people and minorities getting inferior care; they are less likely to have health insurance and receive routine preventive care, they frequently get diagnosed later, and they often undergo less aggressive treatment once they are diagnosed.

[4]
The new study is another chance to weigh biology against disparities in the quality of care.

[5]
“There is good news and puzzling news in our results,” said Kathy S. Albain of Loyola University, whose findings were published online today by the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]
“When there’s a level playing field with the same quality of care, African Americans survive just as well as other races from some of our most common cancers, which is reassuring news and points us nationally toward a need to make sure there is quality of care and equal access to all,” Albain said. “But for prostate, ovarian and breast [cancer], it’s not access to care. There’s something else. And we need to sort that out.”

[7]
Other researchers said the findings were groundbreaking.

[8]
“I believe this is a landmark analysis,” said Lisa A. Newman of the University of Michigan. “There seems to be something associated with racial and ethnic identity that seems to confer a worse survival rate for African Americans. I think it’s likely to be hereditary and genetic factors.”

[9]
A growing body of evidence has suggested that biological factors may be playing a role in health disparities. Genetic variations, for example, appear to make some therapies more effective or less toxic for some people than others. That idea, however, has been controversial and has raised concern that it could distract from the major cause of disparities, such as poverty, prejudice and geographic variation in quality of care.

[10]
Some experts cautioned that the study could not rule out the effects of socioeconomic and environmental factors earlier in life, and expressed worry that the findings could reinforce old prejudices.

[11]
“When I hear scientists talking about racial differences, I worry that it starts to harken back to arguments about genetic inferiority,” said Otis W. Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society and an African American.

[12]
In the new study, Albain and her colleagues used data collected from about 19,457 patients between 1974 and 2001 by the Southwest Oncology Group, a National Cancer Institute-funded national cooperative of clinical trials. Because all patients in the studies received the same treatment, if poverty and other socioeconomic factors were to blame, then differences in survival should remain constant across all cancers, the researchers reasoned.

[13]
A detailed analysis of the data found no statistically significant association between race and survival for lung and colon cancer -- two of the most common forms of cancer -- or for leukemia, lymphoma and myeloma.

[14]
But African Americans were still 49 percent more likely than whites to die from early-stage postmenopausal breast cancer, 41 percent more likely to die from early-stage premenopausal breast cancer, 61 percent more likely to die from advanced ovarian cancer and 21 percent more likely to die from advanced prostate cancer.

[15]
Because all the cancers for which the disparity persisted were related to gender, the findings suggest that the survival gap may be the result of a complex interaction of differences in the biology of the tumors and inherited variations in genes that control metabolism of drugs and hormones, Albain said.

[16]
Some of the difference in breast cancer survival could be explained by the fact that black women are more likely to get a more aggressive form of the disease that is more difficult to treat. But part of Albain’s study and another analysis by researchers at the National Cancer Institute involving more than 244,000 cancer patients nationwide found that could not explain all the difference.

[17]
“This is almost certainly related to a mix of factors across races pertaining to tumor biology and inherited factors,” Albain said.

[18]
Albain disputed suggestions the study could be used to support racial prejudices.

[19]
“We certainly aren’t talking about ‘genetic inferiority’ or stereotypes in our study (or implying it) and it would be a shame to have these results misinterpreted by someone in this way,” Albain wrote in e-mail. “What we are saying is that there is something that ‘tracks’ with African ancestry only in these three diseases. . . . Once we discover the explanation for our findings, tailored treatments will benefit all races.”

[20]
But Brawley, who speaks widely on issues of racial disparity, and others argued that access to high-quality care remains the dominant problem. Socioeconomic factors that occur earlier in life may explain the findings, Brawley said. For example, poor people and minorities are more likely to grow up in polluted neighborhoods and have been hit hardest by the obesity epidemic, which could lead to more difficult-to-treat cancers, he said.

[21]
“These differences are not due to inherent genetics. They are due to the effects of environmental factors like diet and exercise and obesity on biology,” Brawley said.



2009-08-17-NYT-Wade-Hepatitis-C
Genes Tied to Gap in Treatment of Hepatitis C
By NICHOLAS WADE
New York Times, 2009-08-17

[1]
The standard treatment for infection with the hepatitis C virus is a grueling 48-week course of the antiviral drugs interferon and ribavirin that gives some patients flulike symptoms and severe depression. The treatment varies in its effectiveness, being much more successful in Americans of European descent than in African-Americans.

[2]
A Duke University team has now uncovered the principal reason for the disparity between the races. It lies not in differing compliance to the treatment or access to health care, as some have assumed, but in genetics.

[3]
Using a genetic test called a genome-wide association study, the Duke team, led by David B. Goldstein and John McHutchison, found that the coding at a single site on the DNA, out of the three billion sites in the human genome, made all the difference in people’s response to the treatment.

[4]
The site is close to the gene for a special kind of interferon, known as interferon-lambda-3, and may help control the gene’s activity. Some people have the DNA unit T at this site, and others have C. Since a person inherits two copies of the genome, one from each parent, individuals may have T’s on both copies, C’s on both, or one T and one C.

[5]
People with the CC version, or allele, respond much better to the standard hepatitis treatment than do those with the TT allele. The C versions are more common in Europeans than in Africans, and this explains half of the difference in the response between the two races, the Duke team said in a report released Sunday on the Web site of the journal Nature.

[6]
The C versions are even more common among East Asians, about 75 percent of whom respond well to the standard treatment, compared with 55 percent of European-Americans and 25 percent of African-Americans.

[7]
People with the CC versions may produce more interferons, which are virus-fighting substances produced by cells, than those with TT, though the exact mechanism has yet to be worked out.




















2010


2010-05-07-WP-Neanderthal-DNA
Ancient DNA shows interbreeding between Homo sapiens and Neanderthal
by David Brown
Washington Post, 2010-05-07



2010-08-09-NYT-different-ages-of-puberty
First Signs of Puberty Seen in Younger Girls
By DENISE GRADY
New York Times, 2010-08-09

...

Dozens of studies have been published in the years since.
Arguments continue, but
many doctors accept the idea that heavier girls often develop earlier.
And subsequent studies have also found that
black and Hispanic girls mature earlier than whites,
even when weight is taken into account.
No one knows why.

[This is entirely consistent with the findings of J. Phillipe Rushton,
that blacks develop earlier and more rapidly than whites.
Note, for example,
Chapter 2, “Maturation, Crime, and Parenting” and
Chapter 3, “Sex, Hormones, and AIDS”
of Rushton’s Race, Evolution, and Behavior (50-page PDF file).

It should be noted that many blacks, e.g. the group “By Any Means Necessary”,
have made significant efforts to suppress Dr. Rushton’s findings,
to discredit Dr. Rushton, and
to discourage him from continuing a line of research
whose findings they do not like.
So much for seeking the truth, when it conflicts with political correctness
and the agendas of the groups which political correctness advances!]

Labels: ,

Racial profiling

2002-03-21-NYT-NJTP-Study
Study Suggests Racial Gap In Speeding In New Jersey
By DAVID KOCIENIEWSKI
New York Times, 2002-03-21

[Paragraph numbers and emphasis are added.]

[1]
Two years ago, when the Justice Department forced New Jersey officials
to adopt new policies to discourage racial profiling by state troopers,
it also told the state to
study the driving habits of black and white motorists
on the New Jersey Turnpike.


[2]
The task was complicated, but the reason for it was simple:
numerous studies have shown that police officers in New Jersey and elsewhere
stop black and Hispanic drivers for speeding more often than they stop whites.
What is less certain is why --
how much of that disparity is because of racial profiling and
how much, if any, is attributable to differences in driving behavior,
which have never been adequately documented.

[3]
But rather than clarifying the issue, the study created its own muddle.
Justice Department officials say they have such serious questions
about the methods used to gather the data that
they have asked New Jersey’s attorney general not to release the findings.
It is not clear whether they will be made public.

[4]
The study involved
photographing tens of thousands of drivers on the turnpike last spring
while clocking speed with a radar gun.
It found that black drivers sped much more than other drivers,
according to three people who have reviewed the unreleased report.
The racial gap was far wider than officials had expected and,
in the politically charged controversies over profiling,
the data could be used by defenders of the state police to argue that
one reason black drivers are stopped more often than whites is that
they are more likely to speed.

[5]
There is evidence that racial profiling
was common practice in the New Jersey State Police in the 1990’s:
internal police memos;
testimony by troopers; and
training materials that encouraged officers to stop and search minority drivers.
Most striking are police records that show that black and Hispanic motorists,
who make up 30 percent of the drivers on the turnpike,
were subjected to more than 80 percent of the searches.

[6]
There are interpretive disputes over all these issues,
but none more vigorous than the debate over
how to quantify racial profiling on the nation’s highways.

[7]
In North Carolina, for example,
a professor hired in 2000 by the National Institute of Justice
to study whether there are
identifiable differences in driving behavior based on race,
assigned teams of students to travel roads at the speed limit,
record the race of drivers who passed them
and use stopwatches to time the drivers’ speed.
Though the study has not yet been released,
civil rights groups have dismissed its methods as “loony science”
and called Matthew T. Zingraff,
the lead researcher from North Carolina State University,
a racist and a police apologist.
Mr. Zingraff has said he was merely trying
to find new data to quantify racial profiling.

[8]
The analysis of speeders on the New Jersey Turnpike
was designed to reduce human error
by using high-speed photography to help identify the race of drivers.

[9]
The study used specially designed radar gun cameras,
which are used to photograph the license plates of speeders
and whose photos are accepted as evidence in many courts around the country,
to capture images of drivers in a variety of locations on the turnpike.
The study defined speeding as exceeding the speed limit by 15 miles per hour,
and officers are instructed to focus on the most egregious speeders.

[10]
Researchers then showed the photos of 38,747 drivers
to teams of three evaluators who tried to determine each driver’s race,
without knowing whether the driver had sped or not.
At least two evaluators were able to agree on the race
of 26,334 of the drivers photographed,
and an analysis of those motorists found that
the disparity between white and black drivers widened at higher speeds.

[11]
In the southern segment of the turnpike, where the speed limit is 65 m.p.h.,
2.7 percent of black drivers were speeders, compared with
1.4 percent of white drivers.
Among drivers going faster than 90 m.p.h., the disparity was even greater.

[12]
By contrast, blacks were no more likely to speed than whites
when the limit was 55 m.p.h.
In those geographical segments of the turnpike,
13.1 percent of black drivers were speeders, compared with
13.5 percent of white drivers.

[13]
Those results startled officials in the state attorney general’s office,
who had assumed that the radar study would bolster their case
that profiling was widespread.
Instead, the study concluded that blacks make up
16 percent of the drivers on the turnpike and
25 percent of the speeders in the 65 m.p.h. zones,
where complaints of profiling have been most common.

[14]
Recent state police figures showed that
23 percent of the traffic stops on the turnpike involve black drivers.
Before 1999,
when New Jersey agreed to allow a federal monitor to oversee the force,
the best available data showed that
about 27 percent of all turnpike stops involved black drivers,
although troopers were allowed to ignore rules
that they record the driver’s race in each stop,
so many analysts suspect that the actual percentage was far higher.

[15]
While the new report
has only been officially circulated at the Justice Department
and among top officials in the state attorney general’s office,
word of its results are being whispered about in state police barracks
and have cheered those who argue that
racial profiling has been exaggerated by lawyers and journalists.

[16]
“People who are being stopped are being stopped
because of the way they’re operating their vehicles,
not because of their race,”
said David Jones,
vice president of the New Jersey State Troopers Fraternal Association,
who has not seen the report.

[17]
When New Jersey officials prepared to release the report in January,
Mark Posner, a lawyer with the Justice Department’s special litigation section,
asked the state attorney general’s office to withhold it.
Mr. Posner wrote that he feared that
the report’s results may have been skewed by factors like
glare on windshields, weather and camera placements on roadsides.

[18]
“Based on the questions we have identified,
it may well be that the results reported in the draft report
are wrong or unreliable,” Mr. Posner wrote.

[19]
The company, Public Service Research Institute,
says the research methods are sound and that
none of those factors would have affected the results
because they would not have affected black drivers any more than other drivers.

[20]
“We’re quite confident in the validity of the report,”
said Robert B. Voas, a senior researcher on the project,
who would discuss only the methodology of the study.
“If we were allowed to release it,
we’re confident it would be approved by peer review and be published.”

[21]
The Justice Department also raised concerns about
which photos were eliminated from the study,
because researchers discarded photos if no evaluators agreed on a driver’s race,
but included a photo if two of three agreed.
So the consulting firm performed another analysis of the data,
using only those cases in which there was unanimous agreement,
and the racial breakdown of speeders was virtually identical.

[22]
Researchers have acknowledged one apparent weakness in the study:
Only 4.8 percent of the drivers in the photo study were classified as Hispanic,
compared with
14.2 percent of the drivers who identified themselves as Hispanic
during a survey the firm conducted two years ago
by interviewing 4,000 drivers as they stopped to pay tolls.
But the combined total of white and Hispanic drivers was the same in both studies,
as was the number of blacks.
The study’s authors suggest that
Hispanic drivers may have been undercounted in the photo/radar study
because evaluators identified some Hispanic drivers as white.

[23]
Troopers’ union officials said that
the study is being held to an unduly high standard
because its findings weaken the Justice Department’s contention that
racial profiling is pervasive on the turnpike.
The most in-depth previous study of New Jersey roadways,
conducted by professors from Temple and Carnegie Mellon Universities in 1994,
classified the race of drivers on the turnpike
by stationing students on the roadside with binoculars.
Troopers argued that the 1994 study, which concluded that
blacks were four times more likely to be stopped than whites,
received far less public scrutiny,
even though it used far less rigorous scientific methods.

[24]
K. Jack Riley, director of criminal justice research at the Rand Institute,
said he considered the methods in the new study “a good start”
because cameras and teams of evaluators were used to reduce human error.
But he said researchers’ inability
to determine the race of nearly one-third of those drivers who were photographed
will very likely leave the study open to questions.
He suggested that
a second camera be used in future studies to photograph license plates,
allowing researchers to double-check the race of drivers.

[25]
Authors of the study offered two theories
to explain why they found more speeding by blacks.
Demographic research has shown that
the black population is younger than the white population,
and younger drivers are more likely to speed.
The researchers also wrote that
their survey of drivers two years ago found that
black drivers were more likely
to be from out of state and driving long distances than whites,
and those factors might make them more prone to speed.

[26]
Whatever the reasons for the speeding rates found in the study,
civil rights advocates and lawyers said
they cannot obscure the state’s acknowledgment that
racial profiling was an accepted tactic in the department for years.

[27]
“Even if it turns out that
there was evidence that blacks drive differently from whites,
it doesn’t account for the fact that
blacks are four or five times more likely to be searched,”
said William H. Buckman, a lawyer who won
the first New Jersey case in which
a judge acknowledged the existence of racial profiling.
“It also doesn’t account for the fact that
state police gave a handout
giving troopers a whole list of traffic violations
to use as a pretext for racial profiling.
There is so much out there
that no one can credibly deny that racial profiling is a reality.”







2008 Fairfax Schools Behavioral Study Controversy


2008-04-10-WP-Fairfax
Behavioral Study on Students Stirs Debate
Fairfax Report Finds Possible Racial Bias
By Michael Alison Chandler
Washington Post, 2008-04-10

[Paragraph numbers and emphasis are added.]

[1]
For public schools in the No Child Left Behind era,
it has become routine to analyze test scores and other academic indicators
by race and ethnicity.
But the Fairfax County School Board, to promote character education,
has discovered the pitfalls of applying the same analytical techniques
to measures of student behavior,
especially when the findings imply
disparities in behavior among racial, ethnic and other groups.

[2]
The county School Board, which oversees
one of the country’s largest and most diverse suburban school systems,
is scheduled to vote tonight on whether to accept
a staff report that concludes, in part, that
black and Hispanic students and special education students received lower marks
than white and Asian American students
for demonstration of “sound moral character and ethical judgment.”

[3]
Such findings have prompted a debate on
the potential bias in how teachers evaluate student behavior
and how the school system analyzes and presents information about race.
Board member Martina A. “Tina” Hone (At Large), who is African American,
called the school system’s decision to break down data by race
“potentially damaging and hurtful.”

[I, for one, think that what is truly “damaging and hurtful”
is to fail to recognize such discrepancies, if they exist.
The first step to curing a problem is recognizing that the problem exists.
The second step is to not blame the problem on a false cause.]


[4]
The report on student achievement under “Essential Life Skills,”
first presented to the board March 27,
quantifies the moral-ethical gap this way:
“Grade 3 students who received ‘Good’ or better
ranged from a low near 80 percent . . . for Black and Special Education students,
to about 95 percent . . . for Asian and White students.”
The report also indicated that
Hispanic third-graders scored 86 percent on the measure.

[5]
The findings on third-grade morality reflected
the number of elementary students
who received “good” or “outstanding” marks on report cards
in such areas as
“accepts responsibility,”
“listens to and follows directions,”
“respects personal and school property,”
“complies with established rules” and
“follows through on assignments.”
Such categories, which draw mainly on teacher observations, are common.

[6]
For older students, the report’s findings on moral character
were based on the number of state-reported disciplinary infractions,
a measure where minority students tend to be overrepresented.
Disparities among groups were found, however,
to be slimmer for eighth-graders and negligible for 12th-graders.

[7]
The analysis also reported gaps among groups of students in skills such as
being able to “contribute effectively within a group dynamic,”
resolve conflicts and
make healthy life choices.

[8]
School officials said they were seeking to broaden the definition of student achievement and devise new ways to measure progress toward key goals
to prepare a 21st-century workforce.

[Hey, come on!
There is nothing new about the requirement for sound personal character
to be a good citizen.
When I was a Boy Scout, decades ago, becoming an Eagle Scout
required earning merit badges in
Citizenship in the Home, Community, Nation, and World (four merit badges in all).
The point is there is more to becoming a good citizen
than just being a good worker.
But the leaders of today’s society seem remarkably unwilling to talk about that.]


[9]
Officials acknowledge that their initial findings are not conclusive.
Hone intends to propose that a vote on the report be delayed
until the School Board and staff members
have had time to discuss the merits of data analysis according to race.

[I.e.: Until the black community has time to do its lobbying and politicking.]

[10]
“We have to be very, very careful about [how] the story is being told
and have all kinds of asterisks and footnotes, and say,
‘We recognize that some of this might not be the child’s fault,’ ”
Hone said at the March 27 meeting.

[11]
In an interview later she said,
“There is a fundamental difference between looking at race
vis-a-vis the achievement gap in academics, where you have hard data,”
and gaps in areas subject to possible teacher bias.

[12]
The Fairfax school system is the region’s largest,
with more than 165,700 students. About
48 percent are white,
11 percent black,
17 percent Hispanic and
18 percent Asian American, and
6 percent are listed as other or unspecified.
Two of the board’s 12 members belong to racial or ethnic minorities.

[13]
The Fairfax initiative, prompted by the board,
comes as schools nationwide are pushing to enhance character education,
emphasizing the teaching of social and emotional skills.
The thinking is that students need more than reading and math skills
mandated by the federal No Child Left Behind law.

[14]
“More districts are finding that just focusing on [test scores]
is not getting them there,” [where?]
said Merle Schwartz, director of education and research at the Character Education Partnership, an advocacy group in Washington.
“There is something missing.
But how to do this systematically and how to measure it?
We don’t have all the answers yet.”

[15]
In 2006, after 33 public meetings,
the board approved the goals for life skills
and sought to define behavior that reflects sound moral character, such as
“Model honesty and integrity” and
“Respect people, property and authority.”
School officials, at the board’s direction,
then hunted for relevant indicators to measure progress and analyzed them.

[16]
In some cases,
sufficient data were not available to make a meaningful analysis of some goals.
Officials said they intend to revise report cards
and create surveys for teachers, students and high school graduates
to assess life-skills goals.

[17]
School Board Chairman Daniel G. Storck (Mount Vernon) emphasized that
the analysis is preliminary and acknowledged that
the board needs to evaluate whether a race-based analysis is appropriate
and helps the board further its goal
of helping every child in the school system acquire these skills.

[18]
“What we are doing [now] and we are doing three years from now
will probably be pretty different,” he said.

[19]
Schools Superintendent Jack D. Dale said some administrators
were “surprised” by the findings that emerged from the analysis.
He said looking more deeply into the data
could lead to new understanding about
social and cultural differences in students,
something he views as critical
in a system with students from about 200 countries.
[The pains and sorrows of multiculturalism.]

[20]
Board member Ilryong Moon (At Large), a Korean American, said
he was “perplexed” that
disparities in measures of character education
seemed to echo academic achievement gaps.

[21]
Educators typically examine racial and ethnic patterns in academic data
to spot problems and direct resources to students who need them most.
Members of the NAACP‘s Fairfax chapter criticized
the school system’s use of such methods
for the character education analysis.

[22]
“I don’t think you can classify a whole group
and say they have lower character or morality,”
said Janice Winters, a member of the chapter’s education committee.
“It sends a poor message to the students:
‘Oh, I’m black, and they don’t expect me to behave.’ ”

[23]
Winters said the school system should take steps to ensure that
teachers are unbiased in their assessment of students.
“That has been an issue over time,” she said.

[24]
Some school officials agreed with the importance of teacher training.
They said, for example,
that there should be a more uniform definition of disruptive behavior.

[25]
Moon and some other board members said
it is valuable to learn about differences in the way students are being assessed.

[26]
“Do we just brush this aside as if it never existed
or do we do something constructive?” Moon said.

[27]
Moon said he wants school officials to study whether teachers
“have a full understanding of whom they teach,
and their different learning styles and family backgrounds.”



2008-04-10-WP-Fairfax-Fisher
A Report on Moral Character Best Left Behind
By Marc Fisher
Washington Post, 2008-04-10

2008-04-11-WP-Fairfax
Fairfax Postpones Vote About Student Behavior Study
By Michael Alison Chandler
Washington Post, 2008-04-11

2008-06-05-WP-Fairfax
Fairfax May Junk Study on Behavior
Staff Report Shows Racial, Ethnic Gaps Among Students
By Michael Alison Chandler
Washington Post, 2008-06-05










2009


2009-07-26-Examiner-Kane
Some racial profiling is more equal than others
by Gregory Kane
Washington Examiner, 2009-07-26

From the years 1999-2002 I, then in my late 40s,
spent nearly every weekend speeding up the New Jersey Turnpike,
ground zero for racial profiling,
according to the [Jesse] Jacksons of the country.
I regularly did 20 mph above the speed limit in my 1992 Honda and
never got stopped once.

[Note: Kane is a black man.]





















2013

2013-05-06-NYT-a-court-rule-directs-cases-over-friskings-to-one-judge
A Court Rule Directs Cases Over Friskings to One Judge
By JOSEPH GOLDSTEIN
New York Times, 2013-05-06

[This article is not about the issues involved with racial profiling per se,
but about the legal tactic an evidently quite liberal judge has used
to ensure that she she hears cases on the issue.
Here are some samples from the article:]


...

Judge Scheindlin has come to exercise near exclusive jurisdiction
in deciding whether the Police Department’s policies
adhere to Fourth Amendment restrictions for officers conducting street stops.

...

In a city with dozens of Federal District Court judges, it is striking that
a single judge has so many opportunities to rule on
one of the Police Department’s signature crime-fighting tactics —
a development that has frustrated city officials.

...


2013-08-19-WP-Bloomberg-stop-and-frisk-keeps-new-york-safe
‘Stop and frisk’ is not racial profiling
By Michael R. Bloomberg (Mayor of New York City)
Washington Post Op-Ed, 2013-08-19


2013-11-01-NYT-court-blocks-stop-and-frisk-changes-for-new-york-police
Court Blocks Stop-and-Frisk Changes for New York Police
By JOSEPH GOLDSTEIN
New York Times, 2013-11-01

A federal appeals court on Thursday halted a sweeping set of changes to the New York Police Department’s policy of stopping and frisking people on the street, and, in strikingly personal terms, criticized the trial judge’s conduct in the litigation and removed her from the case.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that the judge, Shira A. Scheindlin, “ran afoul” of the judiciary’s code of conduct by compromising the “appearance of impartiality surrounding this litigation.” The panel criticized how she had steered the lawsuit to her courtroom when it was filed in early 2008.

The ruling effectively puts off a battery of changes that Judge Scheindlin, of Federal District Court in Manhattan, had ordered for the Police Department. It postpones the operations of the monitor who was asked to oversee reforms to the department’s stop-and-frisk practices, which Judge Scheindlin found violated the Fourth and 14th Amendments of the Constitution.

In a two-page order, the panel of three judges also criticized Judge Scheindlin for granting media interviews and for making public statements while the case was pending before her.

...

The judges ordered that the stop-and-frisk lawsuit be reassigned to another judge. The Second Circuit ruling instructs the new judge to put off “all proceedings and otherwise await further action” from the circuit. The panel has not yet taken up whether Judge Scheindlin’s decision reached the correct conclusion.

“In taking these actions, we intimate no view on the substance or merits of the pending appeals,” the two-page order stated.

...

In its ruling, the panel cited an article by The New York Times in a footnote, criticizing the judge for improperly applying a “related-case rule” to bring the stop-and-frisk case under her purview.

...











2015

2015-10-19-WP-georgetown-social-network-accused-of-racial-profiling-is-suspended
Georgetown social network accused of racial profiling is suspended
By Terrence McCoy
Washington Post, 2015-10-19

...

Thousands of messages and hundreds of pictures have deluged the group since February of last year, when the business organization partnered with D.C. police to launch the operation in an attempt to curb shoplifting in one of the nation’s poshest shopping districts.
Approximately 70 percent of that correspondence between January and September cited blacks.
About 90 percent of the photographs posted in the group showed African Americans.

[Notice how this article, and its predecessors,
never mention the percentage of arrests for shoplifting which involve blacks.
That clearly is a relevant statistic to the issue of profiling.
Indeed, if one makes the reasonable supposition
that poor people are more likely than the wealthy to shoplift
(I know there are exceptions, but we are talking probabilities, not absolutes),
and notes that blacks have a higher poverty rate than whites,
than simply by those facts blacks would be more likely to shoplift.]


...

Labels: ,

When race is unmentionable

2014-09-30-WP-police-suspects-arrest-provides-lead-in-harringtons-death
Suspect’s arrest in U-Va. case provides lead in 2009 death of Virginia Tech student
By T. Rees Shapiro, Mary Pat Flaherty and Justin Jouvenal
Washington Post, 2014-09-30

...

In the Fairfax attack,
a 26-year-old Fairfax woman was grabbed by a man on Rock Garden Drive
as she was walking home from a Giant supermarket
around 10 p.m. on Sept. 24, 2005.
The man carried the woman to a nearby swimming pool
and assaulted her before running away.
The woman described the suspect as between 25 to 35 years old
and having a medium build and dark hair.

...

[If the woman could provide that description,
presumably she also knew his race.
I really fail to see how it is appropriate to, in a news story,
give the victim's description of
the approximate age, physical build, and hair color of her assailant,
but not his race.
Why give that much information, but not race?
Why should all men "between 25 to 35 years old
and having a medium build and dark hair"
be under suspicion?]












2015-11-24-WP-Digest
[The following is the complete news story that appeared on page A3
of the Washington print edition of the Tuesday, 2015-11-24, Washington Post.]


Two men charged in death of pastor’s pregnant wife:
Two Indianapolis men have been charged with the killing of a pastor’s pregnant wife during an apparent home burglary,
law-enforcement officials said Monday.
Larry Jo Taylor, 18, and Jalen Watson, 21, both of Indianapolis,
have been charged with murder and other felonies in the death of Amanda Blackburn, 28,
who was shot while she was at home with 1-year-old son Nov. 10,
according to Indianapolis police and the Marion County Prosecutor’s Office.
She died the following day.
The toddler was not hurt.

[My question:
Why, when a person dies at the hands of the police,
is the race of the policeman and the deceased
considered of great news significance
and reported in so many news stories about the death,
while when a woman is raped or killed,
the race of the rapist or killer and the victim
is so uniformly ignored?

A more complete version of the story appeared on-line in the following:]

2015-11-23-WP-ind-police-arrest-teen-for-rape-murder-of-pastors-pregnant-wife-amanda-blackburn
Suspected killer of pastor’s wife ‘watched her bleed,’ court document says
By Niraj Chokshi and Michael E. Miller
Washington Post "Morning Mix", 2015-11-23

[It includes photographs which indicate that both suspects are black
, the victim white.

She is also the runner on the far right here:
]



2015-11-25-WP-flash-mob-hits-designer-store-in-georgetown-steals-13000-worth-of-goods
Flash mob hits designer store in Georgetown, steals $13,000 worth of goods
By Dana Hedgpeth and Peter Hermann
Washington Post, 2015-11-25

A large group of juveniles robbed a designer store in Georgetown Tuesday evening and stole $13,000 worth of items, according to D.C. Police.

The incident happened just before 6 p.m. at the Diesel store in the 3000 block of M Street NW. More than 20 people, police said, went into the store and grabbed several items off the racks, according to a police report. They stole four leather jackets, costing about $800, and an additional $12,000 worth of merchandise.

One person who worked at the store was said to have been pushed from him behind by someone in the crowd. The employee was not injured, according to police.
Police described the suspects only as juveniles.

[Yes, that's right.
Mustn't state the race of the juveniles.
Might support stereotyping, you know.

Looks like the D.C. police are straight-jacketed by political correctness.

Surely the retail store had a video surveillance system which captured the whole event.
Looking forward to when that is made available to the public.
It should be.
For a 2014-02-20 flash rob in Georgetown, see this YouTube video.]




2015-11-29-VDare-a-law-enforcement-veteran-comments-on-racial-profiling-in-georgetown
Georgetown Shoplifting Victims Abandoned Warning App Because PC
From: A Safely-Retired Law Enforcement Veteran
VDare.com, 2015-11-29

...

In other words, this Politically Incorrect app (and the retail employees who used it)
correctly identified who nearly all the criminals were,
the criminals didn’t like it, cried “racism!”
and the pathetic white liberals decided they would rather be robbed and possibly even assaulted or worse,
than be called racist—
even if the photographs showing who the criminals were happened to show truth.

...

[I]n the “not reporting race” calculus, the point is that
WaPo is willing to racially identify the people who frightened or worried the clerks,
because they’re condemning them for being frightened or worried.
But when an actual mob storms into the store and steals more than $12, 000 worth of goods—
WaPo doesn’t consider race “relevant.”

Labels:

2005-02-01

African-American issues

The Jena Six


2007-09-21-Jena-WP-Lugman
Jim Crow Comes for Our Kids
By Amina Luqman
Washington Post Op-Ed, 2007-09-21

[An excerpt; emphasis is added.]

Something about the case of the “Jena 6”
has sparked a rumbling within the black community.
It’s ironic, sadly, because there is an everyday sameness to what has happened.
Consider:
A racially provoked incident and a lackluster community response --
same as ever.
Extreme charges brought for less-than-spectacular alleged crimes --
same as ever.
An overzealous prosecutor, an inept defense attorney, an all-white jury,
witnesses not called, a quick guilty verdict --
same, same, same.
Unfortunately,
any of these elements is less than extraordinary in black American life.

...

The story of the Jena 6 is long and filled with stunning details.
The basic points are these:
In the predominantly white town of Jena, La.,
white students hung three nooses last September
after black students sat under a schoolyard tree
where white students normally congregated.
The white students were suspended for three days.
After black students protested peacefully,
the La Salle Parish district attorney threatened them, saying:
“I can make your life go away with a stroke of a pen.”
Eventually there was
a schoolyard fight
in which a white student was beaten;
he was treated for a concussion and multiple bruises.
Although the student was well enough
to attend a school function the same evening,
six black boys between the ages of 15 and 17 were arrested,
five of whom were charged as adults with attempted murder and conspiracy.
The sixth student was charged as a juvenile.

...


2007-09-22-Jena-WP-King
Three Wrongs to Right
By Colbert I. King (WP’s Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist)
Washington Post, 2007-09-22

[Emphasis is added.]
The ‘Jena 6’
If
the schoolyard fight
had involved only white high school students or only black students,
we wouldn’t be reading about Jena, La.
But it’s not that simple.

A tree for white students only.
Three hangman’s nooses.
Fights between black students and white students.

Enter,
a white prosecutor out to put blacks in their place.
White students were suspended.
Black students were expelled, arrested and charged (as adults) with felonies.

The disproportionately heavy hand of the law on black males --
a story as old as America.

Sick and tired. Converge on Jena. Vigils. Wear black.
Peaceful protest this time.

Next time --
and there will be a next time,
unless that unfair prosecution is reversed
and our unjust criminal justice system is changed --
there’s no telling what an angry community acting in solidarity can and will do.

2007-09-26-Jena-Walters
Justice in Jena
By REED WALTERS (LaSalle Parish District Attorney)
New York Times Op-Ed, 2007-09-22

[An excerpt; emphasis is added.]

...

Last week, a reporter asked me whether, if I had it to do over,
I would do anything differently.
I didn’t think of it at the time, but the answer is yes.
I would have done a better job of explaining that the offenses of Dec. 4, 2006,
did not stem from a “schoolyard fight”
as it has been commonly described in the news media and by critics.

Conjure the image of schoolboys fighting:
they exchange words, clench fists, throw punches,
wrestle in the dirt until classmates or teachers pull them apart.
Of course that would not be aggravated second-degree battery,
which is what the attackers are now charged with.
(Five of the defendants
were originally charged with attempted second-degree murder.)
But that’s not what happened at Jena High School.

The victim in this crime,
who has been all but forgotten amid the focus on the defendants,
was a young man named Justin Barker,
who was not involved in the nooses incident three months earlier.
According to all the credible evidence I am aware of,
after lunch, he walked to his next class.
As he passed through the gymnasium door to the outside,

he was blindsided and knocked unconscious
by a vicious blow to the head thrown by Mychal Bell.
While lying on the ground unaware of what was happening to him,
he was brutally kicked by at least six people.


Imagine you were walking down a city street,
and someone leapt from behind a tree and hit you so hard
that you fell to the sidewalk unconscious.
Would you later describe that as a fight?

Only the intervention of an uninvolved student
protected Mr. Barker from severe injury or death.
There was serious bodily harm inflicted with a dangerous weapon —
the definition of aggravated second-degree battery.
Mr. Bell’s conviction on that charge as an adult has been overturned,
but I considered adult status appropriate because of
his role as the instigator of the attack,
the seriousness of the charge and
his prior criminal record.

...

Reed Walters is the district attorney of LaSalle Parish.







Miscellaneous Articles


2008


2008-03-20-Kristof-AIDS
Obama and Race
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
New York Times, 2008-03-20

[An excerpt; emphasis is added.]

To whites, for example, it has been shocking to hear Mr. Wright suggest that

the AIDS virus was released as
a deliberate government plot to kill black people.


That may be an absurd view in white circles, but
a 1990 survey found that

30 percent of African-Americans
believed this was at least plausible.


“That’s a real standard belief,”
noted Melissa Harris-Lacewell, a political scientist at Princeton
(and former member of Trinity church, when she lived in Chicago).
“One of the things fascinating to me
watching these responses to Jeremiah Wright
is that
white Americans find his beliefs so fringe or so extreme.
When if you’ve spent time in black communities,
they are not shared by everyone, but
they are pretty common beliefs.”
















2009






2009-08-06-Kane-Gregory-structual-inequality
The ugly truth behind ‘structural inequality’
By Gregory Kane
Washington Examiner, 2009-08-06

[1]
He’s 17 and has a juvenile offender record
that runs back to when he was 10 years old;
she’s 16 and the mother of his 8-month-old daughter.

[2]
His name is Lamont Harris.
Marylanders in the Baltimore-Washington area
first learned of this hopeless cretin in early July,
when he was charged with firing the shot on a street in south Baltimore
that left 5-year-old Raven Wyatt struggling for her life with a head wound.
Harris’ arrest in the Raven Wyatt shooting was his 15th in seven years.

[3]
Her name is Dynashaya Hall.
We first met her when she, with no trace of shame,
consented to give a television interview about where Harris was
when Baltimore cops finally caught up to him.

[4]
Her comment should have set off an even greater controversy
than the arrest of Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr.
At least it would have,
if we lived in a country that cherishes family values and morality
as much as it does victimhood.

[5]
“We was in bed together,”
Hall told a reporter about where Harris was when he was arrested.

[6]
He’s 17 and already a career screw-up; she’s 16 and clueless.
Both are black, which is pertinent to this story.
They have an 8-month-old child and,
assuming they were in bed to do what two heterosexuals do in that situation,
were probably about to make another one.

[7]
Do you get the feeling that Obama passed on
the really teachable moment that has presented itself in the last month or so?
Do you get the feeling
he invited the wrong people to the White House for a beer summit?
He should have a dressing down summit at the White House,
and the people he should have invited are
Harris, Hall and whatever four people pass as their pathetic excuses for parents.

[8]
No such lectures from the president will be forthcoming,
except in the most general sense to the most general audience.
So we shouldn’t be surprised that
the president told delegates at the NAACP convention last month:

[9]
“To parents, we can’t tell our kids to do well in school
and then fail to support them when they get home.
You can’t just contract out parenting.
For our kids to excel,
we have to accept our responsibility to help them learn.
That means putting away the Xbox,
putting our kids to bed at a reasonable hour.
It means attending those parent-teacher conferences
and reading to our children
and helping them with their homework.”

[10]
Noble words, ones the delegates applauded.
But they - and Barack Hussein Obama -
know that people like Harris and Hall aren’t likely to be such parents,
and that their parents more than likely weren’t either.
So Obama made sure in his speech to fall back on the old standby:
White racism.

[11]
He didn’t say the words exactly, of course.
He used the new lib-think code term: “structural inequality.”

[12]
“We know that prejudice and discrimination -
at least the most blatant types of prejudice and discrimination -
are not even the steepest barriers to opportunity today,”
Obama told the delegates.
“The most difficult barriers include structural inequalities
that our nation’s legacy of discrimination has left behind,
inequalities still plaguing too many communities
and too often the object of national neglect.”

[13]
I’ll not mince words:
even if by some wave of the magic wand
“structural inequality” were eliminated tomorrow,
that would help people like Harris and Hall not one iota.
By having a child way too young
and with few to no parenting skills themselves -
and with daddy likely on his way to doing a lengthy stretch in prison -
they’ve more or less assured that
their child will grow up poor and disadvantaged.

[14]
When Obama pointed out in his speech that
black American students lag behind whites in reading and math,
he failed to make this connection:
The disparity starts as early as kindergarten,
with parents who send their kids to school
not knowing shapes, primary colors
or possessing a vocabulary that will assure that they won’t fall behind.

[15]
I did a story on one Baltimore daycare center whose director told me
some children there didn’t know basic words like “fork,” “spoon” or “plate.”

[16]
Black children forced to live in such environments
are the victims more of bad parenting
than of any “structural inequality.”

Examiner columnist Gregory Kane is a journalist who lives in Baltimore.

Labels: ,