"Critical Race Theory" has exploded into the national spotlight in 2021.
This post will collect a number of articles on the subject, almost all from my POV, which is extremely critical of the subject.
(Hey, can anyone criticize "critical race theory"?
Some one would like to make "Critical Theory" and its descendant "Critical Race Theory" the ultimate ivory tower,
which can criticize and look for self-interest in everyone else but is itself immune from criticism and examination of self-interest.
To which, I say "b......t".
I don't care how many doctoral degrees you have from once prestigious universities.
That just isn't right.
------------
https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/05/how-critical-race-theory-works/
This is, from my POV, an excellent introduction to the subject.
It presents Critical Race Theory as a descendant of Critical Theory,
which I believe it very clearly is.
<blockquote>[Max] Horkheimer first defined “critical theory” in a 1937 essay
contrasting it with what he called “traditional theory,” which, by his lights,
sought simply to understand and explain a phenomenon.
Critical theory, however, is first and foremost practical.
A theory is critical to the extent that it tries
“to liberate human beings from the circumstances that enslave them” and
“to create a world which satisfies” their “needs and powers.”</blockquote>
Sounds a lot like the view and goals of feminism, doesn't it?
-----------
https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/07/the-culture-wars-come-for-the-american-historical-association/
<blockquote>[The American Historical Associaton] authored a statement, joined by
the American Association of University Professors, the Association of American Colleges and Universities, and PEN America,
bemoaning
“Legislative Efforts to Restrict Education about Racism and American History.”
It has since been co-signed by 130 organizations and counting, many of which represent institutions of higher education.
The statement is a tour de force in presenting both disingenuous arguments and fake narratives.
These bills, the statement reads, intend “to suppress teaching and learning about the role of racism in the history of the United States.”
If that were the aim of the legislation, we all should share their outrage.
Yet state governments are not trying to expunge racism from history textbooks.
Consider the bill that was recently proposed in Texas.
<i>At no point does it mandate that public schools drop the history of racism in America from their curricula.</i>
Any class on American history worth taking can and should cover the transatlantic slave trade, chattel slavery, and Jim Crow, as well as emancipation and the civil-rights movement.
Slavery and racism are indelible sins of our country’s past.
On that you’ll find universal agreement, within the AHA and any other educational organization.
The trouble is that the torrent of critical race theory being foisted on schoolchildren goes far beyond giving them proper history lessons. It indoctrinates them in the notion that invisible systems of racial oppression infuse all parts of American life whereby a nebulous group of those deemed white subjugates a nebulous group of those deemed nonwhite. Take it from a mother in Virginia who survived Maoist China: Critical race theory, she says, is “the American version of the Chinese Cultural Revolution.” Rather than conduct an empirical examination of inequality of outcome, critical race theory dishonestly attributes all racial disparities to racial discrimination.</blockquote>