Russia, Nazism, and guilt by association

Can Jews have a state of their own?

There seems near universal agreement that they can.

Well then, how about the Germans or the French?

Some disagreement on that.

See

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2026/2/5/isaac-conservatives-fault-for-failure/

"The [student journal] Harvard Salient

...

was suspended by its own board of directors in October 

after it published material the board deemed 

“reprehensible, abusive, and demeaning.”

The Salient  had earlier run an article by David F.X. Army '28 that included the line 

"Germany belongs to the Germans, France to the French, Britain to the British, America to the Americans," 

language that closely echoed a slogan used by Adolf Hitler in a 1939 address — a resemblance the magazine later said was unintentional."

(Emphasis added.)

Looks like guilt by association to me.

Now let us consider Russia.

Tulsi Gabbard has been denounced as a "Russian asset."

What is the evidence for that?

Is she taking money, or secret instructions, from Russia, 

or meeting with Russians secretly, other than perhaps in her official duties as DNI?

No evidence for that.

But what is true and visible is that some of the things she says indeed mirror Russian talking points.

Holy crow, so if we agree with Russia on some things, that makes us a Russian asset?

This is clearly guilt by association.

For what I am talking about, Google 

"Is Tulsi Gabbard a Russian asset?". 

The AI-generated summary of what is said on the web about that 

contains the following:

"Critics have pointed to 

her frequent appearances on Russian state media, 

her questioning of U.S. foreign policy, and 

her opposition to intervention in Syria 

as evidence of her being a "Russian asset" or "sympathizer"."