What nutjob Democrats will endorse

Consider this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump

"Contrary to Trump's later assertion that she was a "then almost sixty-year-old woman", 

she is less than three years Trump's senior, being 52 at the time, and he 49. 

Further details of the reputed incident were published in Carroll's 2019 book What Do We Need Men For?: A Modest Proposal. 

Carroll said that on her way out of the store she ran into Trump and he asked for help buying a gift for a woman. 

After she suggested a handbag or a hat, the two reputedly moved on to the lingerie section and joked about the other trying some on. 

Carroll said they ended up in a dressing room together, the door of which was shut ..."

Yo, Democrats.

Why would a 52-year old woman go into a private dressing room with a 49-year old man?

That is a question Democrats won't confront.

They glide over it, and jump to the conclusion that Trump raped, or somehow sexually assaulted, Carroll.

Sure, Dems.

Show us your abandonment of reason, and plausibility.

My view on this:

What Carroll asserted is, to say the least, implausible.

But neither the New York "justice" system, nor the media, nor many Democrats, will acknowledge that implausibility.

They operate in that alternate reality that is political correctness, or wokeism.

------

For an excellent article on the persecution of Donald Trump, see

https://www.takimag.com/article/targeting-trump/